BCDR rules in favour of Barwa

645 views Leave a comment

In a significant ruling, the Bahrain Chamber of Dispute Resolution (BCDR) has ordered two prominent Bahraini companies to repay Barwa International SPC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Barwa Real Estate Company QSC, to repay an amount of SR60m (QR61m) that invested in a Saudi project . The BCDR also ordered the companies pay a compensation for lost profit of 1.5 percent from February 2009 until the judgment payment is received by Barwa, a further BHD 300,000 as compensation and additional cost and expenses.
Barwa has obtained the attachment order from the Bahraini courts and is presenting this order to the Central Bank of Bahrain (CBB) to instruct all banks in Bahrain to freeze the Defendant’s accounts to the amount of the judgment awarded to Barwa.
The Barwa filed case in BCDR against the Bahraini companies Inovest BSC and Al Khaleeji Development Company BSCC in June 2012 related to an investment product promoted by Inovest in 2008, prior to the company obtaining an appropriate license from the CBB.
The investment product, an offering of shares in “Dannat Resort Development Company Limited”, aimed to raise SR733m from investors through a private placement offering so the investors could participate in the profits of a real estate development project to be known as Half-Moon Bay in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The investment was to be managed by the Defendants and completed within three years.
In April 2008, Barwa invested SR60m with Inovest (then known as Tameer) through the private placement of shares in an investment special purpose vehicle, “Dannat Resort Development Company Limited”. The BCDR found that the Defendants failed to raise sufficient capital in the private placement in order to proceed with the proposed investment and the project. The private placement raised only 40 percent of the target capital and yet the Defendants “short-closed” the offering and still utilized the funds raised from Barwa and other investors against the best interests of those investors.
It was also confirmed that at the time of the private placement, Inovest was not licensed by the CBB to be able to offer such investment products to investors or invest money on behalf of others and so any commitment received by or on behalf of the Defendants from investors at that time was therefore in violation of regulations in Bahrain. Lastly, the BCDR ruled that after more than five years since the investment offering took place, no substantial works had commenced on the project site in Saudi Arabia.
The BCDR engaged the assistance of a judicial appointed expert to investigate the claims, interview the relevant parties and produce a detailed report on the investment and the project. The BCDR endorsed the expert’s findings. The BCDR stated that the Defendants clearly lacked the sufficient funds to complete the project. They refused to return the funds prior to formal proceedings when requested to do so by Barwa. The BCDR further ruled that the Defendants used investors’ funds in a way that constituted a major deviation from the agreed contract under the Civil Code of Bahrain.
Consequently, the BCDR handed down a judgment accepting Barwa’s claims and rejecting the arguments of the Defendants. The BCDR ordered that the Defendants repay to Barwa the full amount of Barwa’s original investment of SAR 60m and other compensations, including additional costs and expenses.
The Group Chief Executive Officer of Barwa, Abdulla Abdulaziz Al Subaie, welcomed the ruling and stated “Barwa is delighted with the outcome of the BCDR proceedings and the clear judgement that was handed down in favour of Barwa.
He said: “Barwa diligently pursues those parties that do not honour their commitments to us or act in breach of applicable regulations. Barwa follows a clear and comprehensive legal strategy to ensure, as far as possible, that our interests and those of our stakeholders are protected. Where those interests are prejudiced, Barwa seeks recovery and redress through all appropriate legal means. We were impressed with the efficiency and clarity of judgment of the BCDR and we now look forward to collecting the judgment award.”

Source:Agencies